Falana, Aturu differ on INEC’s law against defection
Two
prominent lawyers have expressed divergent views on a recent proposal
by the Independent National Electoral Commission which seeks a law
against frivolous defection by politicians.
INEC’s National Commissioner in charge
of Election Party Monitoring, Hajiya Amina Zakari, had made the comment
on Tuesday at the opening of the National Stakeholders’ Forum on
Electoral Reforms in Abuja.
She said the law would also empower INEC
to enforce internal democracy in the nomination and substitution of
candidates for election by political parties.
Reacting to INEC’s position, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr. Femi Falana, told Saturday PUNCH that INEC’s intention was in order.
He said that when politicians moved from
the platform of the party on which they were voted to another, they
shortchanged the electorate who had voted them on the basis of the
party’s ideologies, manifesto and programmes.
He said, “What INEC is saying is in order; it is simply saying that things should return to status quo ante.
Before the case between Atiku Abubakar versus the Attorney General of
the Federation, it was illegal in Nigeria to cross from one party to
another. Then such a person was bound to lose his mandate so that he
could contest on the platform of a new party. That was the law.
“Unfortunately, it was the Atiku Abubakar case that allowed for political prostitution.”
Falana said that INEC registers parties
based on ideologies and it is empowered by the electoral Act to promote
civil education and to register voters on a continuous and not periodic
basis.
He therefore tasked INEC to go beyond
changing a law to also educating the electorate to empower them to
reject political prostitutes.
However, in a sharp contrast to the view
expressed by Falana on the appropriateness of a strict law on
defection, a lawyer, Mr. Bamidele Aturu, told Saturday PUNCH that any law from INEC to check defection would be unconstitutional.
He said that though the politicians’
actions were worrisome, the constitution made it their right to belong
to any group they wanted.
He said, “Political parties are not
secret cults so you cannot make a law that tries to make people belong
permanently to a political party. Any law like that should be condemned.
“That doesn’t mean that I support the
prostitution that we see everyday among politicians. It is worrisome in
the political sense but not in the legal sense. It only shows that they
don’t have ideologies, they are just looking for a platform. When they
see that the Peoples Democratic Party is no longer moving fast or that
the tyre is punctured, they look for another vehicle with brand new
tyres. These movements show that they don’t believe in democracy neither
do they have ideologies, all the parties are the same. They have no
developmental agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment